Preview

Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics

Advanced search

Diagnosis of the phenomenon of ‘covert cognition’ in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: clinical cases

https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2025-6-91-98

Abstract

In recent decades, our understanding of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDOC) has expanded significantly thanks to the description of the phenomenon of ‘covert cognition.’ An individual approach is important in its diagnosis, involving the comparison of behavioural and instrumental data for each patient. In our country, research into this phenomenon is only just beginning to develop, which makes it important to accumulate cases of successful detection of various ‘covert’ signs of consciousness. This article presents clinical observations of two patients with PDOC. According to clinical assessment using specialised scales, the first patient was in a vegetative state/had unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with a specially designed set of paradigms, the phenomenon of ‘covert cognition’ was detected in her (cerebral activation, partially correlated with the norm, in response to passive somatosensory, auditory non-verbal and verbal stimuli). The second patient, according to the clinical assessment, corresponded to a minimally conscious state ‘minus’. As a result of fMRI examination, instrumental confirmation of the preservation of certain aspects of consciousness (cerebral activation in response to auditory non-verbal and auditory verbal paradigms) was obtained. The use of a comprehensive multimodal personalised approach to the diagnosis of the phenomenon of ‘covert cognition’ and the possibilities of neurorehabilitation of patients based on the data obtained with its help are discussed.

About the Authors

A. N. Cherkasova
Russian Center of Neurology and Neuroscience; Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Anastasia Nikolaevna Cherkasova - Department of Psycology Lomonosov MSU.

80, Volokolamskoe Sh., 125367 Moscow; 11, Mokhovaya St., Build. 9, 125009 Moscow


Competing Interests:

There are no conflicts of interest



K. A. Yatsko
Russian Center of Neurology and Neuroscience; Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Department of Fundamental Medicine Lomonosov MSU.

80, Volokolamskoe Sh., 125367 Moscow; 27, Lomonosovsky Prospekt, Build. 1, 119991 Moscow


Competing Interests:

There are no conflicts of interest



M. S. Kovyazina
Russian Center of Neurology and Neuroscience; Lomonosov Moscow State University; Federal Scientific Center of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research
Russian Federation

Department of Psycology Lomonosov MSU; 11, Mokhovaya St., Build. 9, 125009 Moscow; 9, Mokhovaya St., Build. 4, 125009, Moscow


Competing Interests:

There are no conflicts of interest



N. A. Varako
Russian Center of Neurology and Neuroscience; Lomonosov Moscow State University; Federal Scientific Center of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research
Russian Federation

Department of Psycology Lomonosov MSU; 11, Mokhovaya St., Build. 9, 125009 Moscow; 9, Mokhovaya St., Build. 4, 125009, Moscow


Competing Interests:

There are no conflicts of interest



Yu. V. Ryabinkina
Russian Center of Neurology and Neuroscience
Russian Federation

80, Volokolamskoe Sh., 125367 Moscow


Competing Interests:

There are no conflicts of interest



E. I. Kremneva
Russian Center of Neurology and Neuroscience
Russian Federation

80, Volokolamskoe Sh., 125367 Moscow


Competing Interests:

There are no conflicts of interest



M. V. Krotenkova
Russian Center of Neurology and Neuroscience
Russian Federation

80, Volokolamskoe Sh., 125367 Moscow


Competing Interests:

There are no conflicts of interest



A. G. Brutyan
Russian Center of Neurology and Neuroscience
Russian Federation

80, Volokolamskoe Sh., 125367 Moscow


Competing Interests:

There are no conflicts of interest



P. A. Fedin
Russian Center of Neurology and Neuroscience
Russian Federation

80, Volokolamskoe Sh., 125367 Moscow


Competing Interests:

There are no conflicts of interest



N. A. Suponeva
Russian Center of Neurology and Neuroscience
Russian Federation

80, Volokolamskoe Sh., 125367 Moscow


Competing Interests:

There are no conflicts of interest



M. A. Piradov
Russian Center of Neurology and Neuroscience
Russian Federation

80, Volokolamskoe Sh., 125367 Moscow


Competing Interests:

There are no conflicts of interest



References

1. Kondziella D, Friberg CK, Frokjaer VG, et al. Preserved consciousness in vegetative and minimal conscious states: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(5):485-92. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-310958

2. Cherkasova AN, Yatsko KA, Kovyazina MS, et al. Detection of the “covert cognition” phenomenon in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness: a review of fMRI data with paradigms. I.P. Pavlov Journal of Higher Nervous Activity. 2023;73(3):291-310 (In Russ.). doi: 10.31857/S0044467723030048

3. Cherkasova AN, Yatsko KA, Kovyazina MS, et al. Development of a set of fMRI paradigms to detecting the “covert cognition” phenomenon: neuropsychological aspects. National Psychological Journal. 2024;19(2):68-80 (In Russ.). doi: 10.11621/npj.2024.0206

4. Cherkasova AN, Yatsko KA, Kovyazina MS, et al. Testing a set of fMRI paradigms to detecting the “covert cognition” phenomenon on a sample of healthy volunteers. Lomonosov Psychology Journal. 2024;47(2):219-42 (In Russ.). doi: 10.11621/LPJ-24-22

5. Piradov MA, Yatsko KA, Cherkasova AN, et al. Results of the application of a set of functional MRI paradigms to diagnose “covert cognition” phenomenon in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2024;16(4):2834 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2024-4-28-34

6. Leech R, Sharp DJ. The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 1):12-32. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt162

7. Корсакова НК, Московичюте ЛИ. Клиническая нейропсихология: учебное пособие для вузов. Москва: Юрайт; 2023. 165 с. Korsakova NK, Moskovichyute LI. Clinical neuropsychology. Moscow: Yurait; 2023. 165 p. (In Russ.).

8. Coleman MR, Davis MN, Rodd JM, et al. Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Brain. 2009;132(Pt 9):2541-52. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp183

9. Han M-E, Park SY, Oh S-O. Large-scale functional brain networks for consciousness. Anat Cell Biol. 2021;54(2):152-64. doi: 10.5115/acb.20.305

10. Nakane T, Miyakoshi M, Nakai T, Naganawa S. How the non-attending brain hears its owner's name. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26(10):3889-904. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv184

11. Qin P, Di H, Liu Y, et al. Anterior cingulate activity and the self in disorders of consciousness. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010;31(12):1993-2002. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20989

12. Naci L, Cusack R, Anello M, Owen A. A common neural code for similar conscious experiences in different individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(39):14277-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407007111

13. Luria AR. Higher cortical functions in man. St. Petersburg: Piter. 2022. 768 p. (In Russ.).

14. Schirmer A, Fox PM, Grandjean D. On the spatial organization of sound processing in the human temporal lobe: a meta-analysis. NeuroImage. 2012;63(1):137-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.025

15. Särkämö T, Tervaniemi M, Huotilainen M. Music perception and cognition: development, neural basis, and rehabilitative use of music. WIREs Cogn Sci. 2013;4:441-51. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1237

16. Sander K, Scheich H. Left auditory cortex and amygdala, but right insula dominance for human laughing and crying. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005;17(10):1519-31. doi: 10.1162/089892905774597227

17. Meyer M, Zysset S, von Cramon DY, Alter K. Distinct fMRI responses to laughter, speech, and sounds along the human peri-sylvian cortex. Cogn Brain Res. 2005;24(2):291-306. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.008

18. Хомская ЕД. Нейропсихология. Санкт-Петербург: Питер; 2005. 496 c. Khomskaya ED. Neuropsychology. St. Petersburg: Piter. 2005. 496 p. (In Russ.).

19. Bick AS, Leker RR, Ben-Hur T, Levin N. Implementing novel imaging methods for improved diagnosis of disorder of consciousness patients. J Neurol Sci. 2013;334(1-2):130-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.08.009

20. Wang F, Di H, Hu X, et al. Cerebral response to subject’s own name showed high prognostic value in traumatic vegetative state. BMC Med. 2015;13:83. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0330-7

21. Fufaeva EV, Mikadze YuV, Cherkasova AN, et al. Recovery of consciousness: opportunities for neuropsychological assessment and rehabilitation. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin. 2021;3:102-28 (In Russ.). doi: 10.11621/vsp.2021.03.06

22. Zaitsev OS, Tsarenko SV. Neuroreanimatology. Coma recovery (therapy of post-comatose states). Moscow: Litass; 2012. 120 p. (In Russ.).

23. Formica C, De Salvo S, Corallo F, et al. Role of neurorehabilitative treatment using transcranial magnetic stimulation in disorders of consciousness. J Int Med Res. 2021;49(2). doi: 10.1177/0300060520976472


Review

For citations:


Cherkasova AN, Yatsko KA, Kovyazina MS, Varako NA, Ryabinkina YV, Kremneva EI, Krotenkova MV, Brutyan AG, Fedin PA, Suponeva NA, Piradov MA. Diagnosis of the phenomenon of ‘covert cognition’ in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: clinical cases. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2025;17(6):91-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2025-6-91-98

Views: 50


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-2711 (Print)
ISSN 2310-1342 (Online)