Preview

Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics

Advanced search

Switching from ocrelizumab to ofatumumab: key potential reasons based on real-world clinical practice

https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2025-3-92-97

Abstract

In everyday neurological practice, B-cell-depleting therapies are playing an increasingly important role in the treatment of active forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Among the most well-studied agents are monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the CD20 receptor on lymphocytes: ocrelizumab (a humanized mAb) and ofatumumab (a fully human mAb), which bind to different extracellular epitopes of the CD20 receptor. In relapsing forms of MS, the pharmacological characteristics of these agents often necessitate switching from the better-known intravenous drug ocrelizumab to the subcutaneous agent ofatumumab.

This review, illustrated through clinical case examples, discusses the primary reasons for such a switch-both objective (such as insufficient efficacy or intolerance) and subjective. Among the latter, an increasingly relevant factor is the phenomenon of "treatment fatigue" associated with regular intravenous infusions, particularly when therapy has been ongoing for a long period. This fatigue may manifest as feelings of exhaustion or low mood, which negatively impact adherence and, consequently, treatment efficacy.

About the Authors

A. N. Boyko
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; Federal Center for Brain and Neurotechnologies, FMBA of Russia
Russian Federation

Alexey Nikolaevich Boyko

1, Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997

1, Ostrovityanova St., Build. 10, Moscow 117997


Competing Interests:

The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study



T. O. Simaniv
Research Center of Neurology
Russian Federation

80, Volokolamskoe Sh., Moscow 125367


Competing Interests:

The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study



T. A. Prokopyeva
Kurgan Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

63, Tomina St., Kurgan 640002


Competing Interests:

The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study



S. V. Petrov
Moscow Center for Multiple Sclerosis
Russian Federation

7, Skaryatinskiy Lane, Moscow 121069


Competing Interests:

The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study



M. V. Melnikov
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; Federal Center for Brain and Neurotechnologies, FMBA of Russia; National Research Center “Institute of Immunology”, FMBA of Russia
Russian Federation

1, Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997

1, Ostrovityanova St., Build. 10, Moscow 117997

30, Volokolamskoe Sh., Moscow 123182


Competing Interests:

The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study



References

1. Walton C, King R, Rechtman L, et al. Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: Insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition. Mult Scler. 2020 Dec;26(14):1816-21. doi: 10.1177/1352458520970841. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

2. Number of people with MS. Atlas of MS (4th edition 2024). Available at: atlaspfms.org

3. Gusev EI, Boyko AN. Multiple sclerosis. Vol. 1. Moscow: ROOI “Zdorovie cheloveka”; 2020. P. 159-309. ISBN978-5-6044140-2-6 (In Russ.)].

4. Arneth BM. Impact of B cells to the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation. 2019 Jun 25;16(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1517-1

5. Van Langelaar J, Rijvers L, Smolders J, van Luijn MM. B and T Cells Driving Multiple Sclerosis: Identity, Mechanisms and Potential Triggers. Front Immunol. 2020 May 8;11:760. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00760

6. Machado-Santos J, Saji E, Tröscher AR, et al. The compartmentalized inflammatory response in the multiple sclerosis brain is composed of tissue-resident CD8+ T lymphocytes and B cells. Brain. 2018 Jul 1;141(7):2066-82. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy151

7. Frischer JM, Bramow S, Dal-Bianco A, et al. The relation between inflammation and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis brains. Brain. 2009 May;132(Pt 5):1175-89. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp070. Epub 2009 Mar 31.

8. Magliozzi R, Howell O, Vora A, et al. Meningeal B-cell follicles in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis associate with early onset of disease and severe cortical pathology. Brain. 2007 Apr;130(Pt 4):1089-104. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm038

9. De Seze J, Maillart E, Gueguen A, et al. Anti-CD20 therapies in multiple sclerosis: From pathology to the clinic. Front Immunol. 2023 Mar 23;14:1004795. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1004795

10. Crickx E, Weill JC, Reynaud CA, Mahevas M. Anti-CD20-mediated B-cell depletion in autoimmune diseases: successes, failures and future perspectives. Kidney Int. 2020 May;97(5):885-93. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.12.025. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

11. Baecher-Allan C, Kaskow BJ, Weiner HL.Multiple Sclerosis: Mechanisms and Immunotherapy. Neuron. 2018 Feb 21;97(4):742-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.021

12. Boyko AN, Lasch NYu, Guseva ME. New drugs for anti-B-cell therapy of multiple sclerosis. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2018;18(1):70-3. doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2018-1-70-73 (In Russ.)].

13. Walshe CA, Beers SA, French RR, et al.Induction of cytosolic calcium flux by CD20 is dependent upon B Cell antigen receptor signaling. J Biol Chem. 2008 Jun 20;283(25):16971-84. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708459200. Epub 2008 Apr 21.

14. Rouge L, Chiang N, Steffek M, et al.Structure of CD20 in complex with the therapeutic monoclonal antibody rituximab. Science. 2020 Mar 13;367(6483):1224-30. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz9356. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

15. Bar-Or A, O'Brien SM, Sweeney ML, et al.Clinical Perspectives on the Molecular and Pharmacological Attributes of Anti-CD20 Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis. CNS Drugs. 2021 Sep;35(9):985-97. doi: 10.1007/s40263021-00843-8. Epub 2021 Aug 9.

16. Klein C, Lammens A, Schäfer W, et al. Epitope interactions of monoclonal antibodies targeting CD20 and their relationship to functional properties. MAbs. 2013 JanFeb;5(1):22-33. doi: 10.4161/mabs.22771. Epub 2012 Dec 4.

17. Boyko AN, Alifirova VM, Lukashevich IG, et al. Efficacy and safety of antiCD20 monoclonal antibody divozilimab during 48-week treatment of multiple sclerosis patients in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS. Zhurnal nevrologii i psihiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova = S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2023;123(7-2):4352 doi: 10.17116/jnevro202312307243 (In Russ.)].

18. Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Comi G, et al;OPERA I and OPERA II Clinical Investigators. Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 19;376(3):221-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601277. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

19. Montalban X, Hauser SL, Kappos L, et al; ORATORIO Clinical Investigators. Ocrelizumab versus Placebo in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 19;376(3):209-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606468. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

20. Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Cohen JA, et al; ASCLEPIOS I and ASCLEPIOS II Trial Groups. Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):546-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917246

21. Kappos L, Traboulsee A, Li DKB, et al.Ocrelizumab exposure in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: 10-year analysis of the phase 2 randomized clinical trial and its extension. J Neurol. 2024 Feb;271(2):642-57. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11943-4. Epub 2023 Oct 31.

22. Cerqueira JJ, Berthele A, Cree BAC, et al.Long-Term Treatment With Ocrelizumab in Patients With Early-Stage Relapsing MS: Nine-Year Data From the OPERA Studies Open-Label Extension. Neurology. 2025 Feb 25;104(4):e210142. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000210142. Epub 2025 Jan 30.

23. Akbayir E, Kizilay T, Erol R, et al. B-Celland T-Cell Populations in Peripheral Blood Linked to Ocrelizumab Treatment Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis. In Vivo. 2025 Mar-Apr;39(2):1162-72. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13920

24. Baker D, Marta M, Pryce G, et al. Memory B Cells are Major Targets for Effective Immunotherapy in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. EBioMedicine. 2017 Feb;16:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.01.042. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

25. Feige J, Moser T, Akgün K, et al. Repeated iv anti-CD20 treatment in multiple sclerosis: Long-term effects on peripheral immune cell subsets. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Feb;11(2):450-65. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51965. Epub 2024 Jan 10.

26. Kappos L, Wolinsky JS, Giovannoni G, et al. Contribution of Relapse-Independent Progression vs Relapse-Associated Worsening to Overall Confirmed Disability Accumulation in Typical Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in a Pooled Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Neurol. 2020 Sep 1;77(9):1132-40. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1568

27. Cellerino M, Boffa G, Lapucci C, et al.Predictors of Ocrelizumab Effectiveness in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics. 2021 Oct;18(4):2579-88. doi: 10.1007/s13311-021-01104-8. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

28. Erdogan T, Cansu C, Kocer B, et al. Real-world effectiveness, safety and immunogenicity of ocrelizumab in turkish multiple sclerosis patients: a single-center experience for 4-year follow-up. Acta Neurol Belg. 2024 Aug;124(4):1385-91. doi: 10.1007/s13760-02402572-3. Epub 2024 May 20.

29. Zanghi A, Borriello G, Bonavita S, et al.Ocrelizumab and ofatumumab comparison: an Italian real-world propensity score matched study. J Neurol. 2024 Jul;271(7):4495-502. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12360-x. Epub 2024 May 4.

30. Alvarez E, Longbrake EE, Rammohan KW,et al. Secondary hypogammaglobulinemia in patients with multiple sclerosis on anti-CD20 therapy: Pathogenesis, risk of infection, and disease management. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Nov;79:105009. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.105009. Epub 2023 Sep 15.

31. Toorop AA, van Lierop ZYGJ, Strijbis EMM,et al. The wearing-off phenomenon of ocrelizumab in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Jan;57:103364. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103364. Epub 2021 Nov 1.

32. Monteiro I, Nicolella V, Fiorenza M, et al.The ocrelizumab wearing-off phenomenon is associated with reduced immunomodulatory response and increased neuroaxonal damage in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2024 Aug;271(8):5012-24. doi: 10.1007/s00415-02412434-w. Epub 2024 May 23.


Review

For citations:


Boyko AN, Simaniv TO, Prokopyeva TA, Petrov SV, Melnikov MV. Switching from ocrelizumab to ofatumumab: key potential reasons based on real-world clinical practice. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2025;17(3):92-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2025-3-92-97

Views: 84


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-2711 (Print)
ISSN 2310-1342 (Online)