Difficulties in differential diagnosis of glial tumors and limbic encephalitis: literature data, clinical observations
https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2024-4-54-60
Abstract
Temporal and parahippocampal glial tumors at early morphological stages of their development may mimic the clinical and neuroimaging picture of limbic encephalitis. Delayed diagnosis of glioblastoma can have a negative impact on the prognosis of the disease, which is why there is a need to find approaches for its earlier detection.
The aim of this paper is to analyze possible difficulties and errors in the differential diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and glioblastoma based on literature data and our own clinical observations.
Features such as onset of the disease at a young age, subacute development of symptoms, response to immunosuppressive therapy and the MRI imaging of bilateral T2 hyperintense changes in the limbic areas are typical for AE, but do not exclude the diagnosis of a primary tumor of the central nervous system. Therefore, caution should be exercised regarding the likelihood of a primary brain tumor when patients of any age group present with symptoms characteristic of AE, especially if no specific for AE antibodies are detected. To shorten the time to diagnosis, a multidisciplinary approach, critical analysis of clinical data, a shortening of the examination interval and an increase in the frequency of imaging follow-up examinations are required.
About the Authors
A. A. BelkinaRussian Federation
Anna Andreevna Belkina
125367; 80, Volokolamskoe Shosse; Moscow
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
E. O. Chekanova
Russian Federation
125367; 80, Volokolamskoe Shosse; Moscow
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
I. V. Zakroyshchikova
Russian Federation
125367; 80, Volokolamskoe Shosse; Moscow
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
R. N. Konovalov
Russian Federation
125367; 80, Volokolamskoe Shosse; Moscow
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
M. N. Zakharova
Russian Federation
125367; 80, Volokolamskoe Shosse; Moscow
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
References
1. Graus F, Vogrig A, Muniz-Castrillo S, et al. Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021 May 18;8(4):e1014. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000001014
2. Graus F, Titulaer MJ, Balu R, et al. A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Apr;15(4):391-404. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00401-9. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
3. Antonelli M, Poliani PL. Adult type diffuse gliomas in the new 2021 WHO Classification. Pathologica. 2022 Dec;114(6):397-409. doi: 10.32074/1591-951X-823
4. Kim M, Ladomersky E, Mozny A, et al. Glioblastoma as an age-related neurological disorder in adults. Neurooncol Adv. 2021 Sep 4;3(1):vdab125. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab125
5. Vogrig A, Joubert B, Ducray F, et al. Glioblastoma as differential diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. J Neurol. 2018 Mar;265(3):669-77. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8767-1. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
6. Zoccarato M, Valeggia S, Zuliani L, et al. Conventional brain MRI features distinguishing limbic encephalitis from mesial temporal glioma. Neuroradiology. 2019 Aug;61(8):853-60. doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02212-1. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
7. Chang Y, Donglan Y, Xinchong S, et al. One-day protocol for 18F-FDG and 13N-ammonia PET/CT with uptake decoupling score in differentiating untreated low-grade glioma from inflammation. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed). 2020 Mar-Apr;39(2):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.remn.2019.08.001. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
8. Han Y, Yang Y, Shi ZS, et al. Distinguishing brain inflammation from grade II glioma in population without contrast enhancement: a radiomics analysis based on conventional MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2021 Jan;134:109467. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109467. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
9. Zheng F, Yin P, Yang L, et al. MRI-Based Machine Learning Fusion Models to Distinguish Encephalitis and Gliomas. J Imaging Inform Med. 2024 Apr;37(2):653-65. doi: 10.1007/s10278-023-00957-z. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
10. Zhao K, Gao A, Gao E, et al. Multiple diffusion metrics in differentiating solid glioma from brain inflammation. Front Neurosci. 2024 Jan 30;17:1320296. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1320296
11. Parbel S, Vlaho S, Gebhardt B, et al. Diagnostic difficulties in encephalitis and glioma. Klin Padiatr. 2007;219(4):222-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-933521
12. Deramecourt V, Bombois S, Debette S, et al. Bilateral temporal glioma presenting as a paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis with pure cognitive impairment. Neurologist. 2009 Jul;15(4):208-11. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e31818fc022
13. Nunes J, Carvalho S, Gouveia P, et al. Glioblastoma multiforme mimetizando encefalite limbica [Glioblastoma multiforme mimicking limbic encephalitis]. Acta Med Port. 2012;25 Suppl 1:48-51. Epub 2012 Nov 2 (In Port.).
14. Mansfield R, Yong W, Shah K, Trip SA. Glioblastoma: a mimic of NMDA receptor encephalitis. BMJ Case Rep. 2020 Sep 22;13(9):e237358. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-237358
15. Rokutanda T, Inatomi Y, Yonehara T, et al. [A case of glioblastoma misdiagnosed initially due to positive finding of anti-glutamate receptor antibody]. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2008;48(7):497-500. doi: 10.5692/clinicalneurol.48.497
16. Consoli S, Dono F, Evangelista G, et al. Case Report: Brain tumor's pitfalls: two cases of high-grade brain tumors mimicking autoimmune encephalitis with positive onconeuronal antibodies. Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 24;13:1254674. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1254674
Review
For citations:
Belkina AA, Chekanova EO, Zakroyshchikova IV, Konovalov RN, Zakharova MN. Difficulties in differential diagnosis of glial tumors and limbic encephalitis: literature data, clinical observations. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2024;16(4):54-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2024-4-54-60