Validation of the Russian version of Swiss Narcolepsy Scale for narcolepsy type 1 screening
https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2024-4-35-40
Abstract
Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Scale (UNS) is the most widely used scale for primary screening for narcolepsy. It has a high sensitivity (83.5 %) and specificity (84.1 %). However, the length of the scale and the time taken by patients to complete it may limit its use. The shortest scale for primary detection of narcolepsy type 1 is the Swiss Narcolepsy Scale (SNS), which also has a high sensitivity (89 %) and specificity (88 %).
Objective: to validate the SNS in Russian language and compare it with English and German versions as well as with some other scales.
Material and methods. 53 patients with narcolepsy type 1 were included. Narcolepsy was diagnosed according to the ICSD-3 criteria. The control group consisted of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (n = 71) and chronic insomnia (n = 31). Sensitivity and specificity of the Russian version of the scale (RU-SNS) were compared with UNS and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaires.
Results. The mean score of the RU-SNS for patients with narcolepsy was – 33.64 ± 5.14. In the control group, the mean score was 29.75 ± 16.68. The sensitivity and specificity were 84.9 % and 95.1 %, respectively. For UNS, the mean score was 32.79 ± 9.87 in the narcolepsy group and 8.35 ± 4.84 in the control group. Sensitivity was 96.2 % and specificity – 84.3 %. For ESS, the mean score in narcolepsy group was 17.75 ± 4.28 and 8.7 ± 5.7 for controls. The sensitivity was estimated at 94.3 % and specificity at 61.8 %.
Conclusion. The RU-SNS demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, while the UNS also has high sensitivity but low specificity. ESS has high sensitivity but low specificity as it is only designed to detect pathological daytime sleepiness. Based on these data, the SNS can be used as a valid tool for the early diagnosis of narcolepsy type 1.
About the Authors
A. O. GolovatyukRussian Federation
Andrey Olegovich Golovatyuk
Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery
119021; 11, Rossolimo St., Build. 1; Moscow
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
A. S. Kuts
Russian Federation
Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery
119021; 11, Rossolimo St., Build. 1; Moscow
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
A. Yu. Melnikov
Russian Federation
Department of Somnology
123182; 30, Volokolamskoe Shosse, Build. 2; Moscow
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
A. V. Zaharov
Russian Federation
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery
443099; 89, Chapaevskaya St.; Samara
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
M. G. Poluektov
Russian Federation
Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery
119021; 11, Rossolimo St., Build. 1; Moscow
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
C. Bassetti
Switzerland
Department of Neurology
3012; 6, Hochschulstrasse; Canton of Bern; Bern
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
References
1. Westphal C. Eigentümliche mit Einschlafen verbundene Anfälle. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr. 1877;7:631-5 (In Germ.).
2. Gelineau J. De la narcolepsie. Gaz Hop. 1880;53-54:626-37 (In French).
3. Fischer F. Epileptoide Schlafzustände. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr. 1878;8:200-3 (In Germ.).
4. Yoss RE, Daly DD. Criteria for the diagnosis of the narcoleptic syndrome. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin. 1957 Jun 12;32(12):320-8.
5. Vogel G. Studies in psychophysiology of dreams. III. The dream of narcolepsy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1960 Oct;3:421-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1960.01710040091011
6. Honda Y, Asaka A, Tanaka Y, Juji T. Discrimination of narcolepsy by using genetic markers and HLA. Sleep Res. 1983;12:254.
7. Mignot E. Genetic and familial aspects of narcolepsy. Neurology. 1998 Feb;50(2 Suppl 1):S16-22. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.2_suppl_1.s16
8. Mignot E, Lin L, Rogers W, et al. Complex HLA-DR and -DQ interactions confer risk of narcolepsy-cataplexy in three ethnic groups. Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Mar;68(3):686-99. doi: 10.1086/318799. Epub 2001 Feb 13.
9. Nishino S, Ripley B, Overeem S, et al. Hypocretin (orexin) deficiency in human narcolepsy. Lancet. 2000 Jan 1;355(9197):39-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05582-8
10. Latorre D, Kallweit U, Armentani E, et al. T cells in patients with narcolepsy target self-antigens of hypocretin neurons. Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7725):63-8. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0540-1. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
11. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-3) 3rd ed. AASM; 2014.
12. Sarkanen T, Alakuijala A, Partinen M. Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Scale in diagnosis of narcolepsy. Sleep. 2019 Mar 1;42(3):zsy238. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsy238
13. Johns MW. Sensitivity and specificity of the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT), the maintenance of wakefulness test and the epworth sleepiness scale: failure of the MSLT as a gold standard. J Sleep Res. 2000 Mar;9(1):5-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2869.2000.00177.x
14. Sturzenegger C, Bassetti CL. The clinical spectrum of narcolepsy with cataplexy: a reappraisal. J Sleep Res. 2004 Dec;13(4):395-406. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2004.00422.x
15. Sturzenegger C, Baumann C, Lammers G, et al. Swiss Narcolepsy Scale: A simple screening tool for hypocretin-deficient narcolepsy with cataplexy. Clin Translat Neurosci. Jul-Dec 2018:1-5.
16. Thorpy MJ, Cronin S, Temple H. Age of onset and time to diagnosis of narcolepsy. Neurology. 1999;52(Suppl 2):A110.
Review
For citations:
Golovatyuk AO, Kuts AS, Melnikov AY, Zaharov AV, Poluektov MG, Bassetti C. Validation of the Russian version of Swiss Narcolepsy Scale for narcolepsy type 1 screening. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2024;16(4):35-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2024-4-35-40