Resolution of the Expert Council on the problem of early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease
https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2024-5-111-119
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disease and the most common cause of dementia. In daily practice, AD is often diagnosed late, while the early stages of the disease are overlooked or mistaken for cerebrovascular pathology. However, the efficacy of existing and newly developed (disease-modifying) AD therapies is the greatest in the early stages of the disease. An accurate diagnosis of AD is possible when biological markers of the main pathological process (cerebral amyloidosis, tauopathy) are detected using positron emission tomography or neurochemical examination of cerebrospinal fluid, which are gradually being introduced into practice in Russia. The experts discussed the clinical aspects of the use of biological markers, obtained in the leading specialized centers of our country for the diagnosis and treatment of cognitive impairment (CI). First and foremost, biomarker testing is indicated in patients with mild CI and mild dementia possibly associated with AD, so that disease-modifying (pathogenetic) therapy can be initiated as early as possible upon on its availability (currently, drugs for anti-amyloid disease-modifying therapy are not registered in the Russian Federation). Patients with a non-classical (non-amnestic) or atypical AD phenotype are another group of patients in whom it is also advisable to analyze biomarkers for differential diagnostic purposes.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. N. BogolepovaRussian Federation
Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics of the Faculty of MedicineN.I. Pirogov RNRMU.
1, Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997; 1, Ostrovityanova St., Build. 10, Moscow 117997
Competing Interests:
The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study
E. E. Vasenina
Russian Federation
Department of Neurology with a course of reflexology and manual therapy, Center for extrapyramidal and cognitive disorders.
2/1, Barrikadnaya St., Build. 1, Moscow 125993
Competing Interests:
The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study
N. V. Vakhnina
Russian Federation
Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery, N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicineю
11, Rossolimo St., Build. 1, Moscow 119021
Competing Interests:
The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study
S. V. Vorobyеv
Russian Federation
Department of Neurology with a Clinic of Institute of Medical Education.
2, Akkuratova St., St. Petersburg 197341
Competing Interests:
The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study
S. I. Gavrilova
Russian Federation
Department of Geriatric Psychiatry.
34, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
Competing Interests:
The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study
А. Yu. Emelin
Russian Federation
Department of Nervous Diseases.
6, Akademika Lebedeva St., St. Petersburg 194044
Competing Interests:
The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study
V. V. Zakharov
Russian Federation
Vladimir Vladimirovich Zakharov - Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery, N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicineю
11, Rossolimo St., Build. 1, Moscow 119021
Competing Interests:
The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study
S. N. Illarioshkin
Russian Federation
Department of Neurology RUM.
80, Volokolamskoe Shosse, Moscow 125367; 4, Dolgorukovskaya St., Build. 7, Moscow 125006
Competing Interests:
The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study
O. V. Kosivtsova
Russian Federation
Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery, N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicineю
11, Rossolimo St., Build. 1, Moscow 119021
Competing Interests:
The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study
G. P. Kostyuk
Russian Federation
Department of Mental Health Lomonosov MSU.
1, Leninskye Gory, Moscow 119991; 2, Zagorodnoe Shosse, Moscow 117152
Competing Interests:
The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study
O. S. Levin
Russian Federation
Department of Neurology with a course of reflexology and manual therapy, Center for extrapyramidal and cognitive disorders.
2/1, Barrikadnaya St., Build. 1, Moscow 125993
Competing Interests:
The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study
E. A. Mkhitaryan
Russian Federation
Department of Aging Diseases, Faculty of Continuing Professional Education, Russian Clinical and Research Centre of Gerontology.
1, Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997; 16, 1st Leonova St., Moscow 129226
Competing Interests:
The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study
V. А. Parfenov
Russian Federation
Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery, N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicineю
11, Rossolimo St., Build. 1, Moscow 119021
Competing Interests:
The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study
O. N. Tkacheva
Russian Federation
Department of Aging Diseases, Faculty of Continuing Professional Education, Russian Clinical and Research Centre of Gerontology.
1, Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997; 16, 1st Leonova St., Moscow 129226
Competing Interests:
The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study
Yu. A. Shpilyukova
Russian Federation
80, Volokolamskoe Shosse, Moscow 125367
Competing Interests:
The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study
References
1. Prince M, Prina M, Guerchet M. The world Alzheimer's report 2013. Journey of caring: an analysis of long-term care for dementia. Available at: https://www.alz.co.uk/research/worldalzheimerreport2013.pdf
2. Saxena S. Dementia world report: a public health priority. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012.
3. Wimo A, Prince M. The world Alzheimer's report 2010: the global impact of dementia. Alzheimer's disease International. Available at: https://www.alz.org.documents/national/world_alzeimer_report_2010.pdf
4. Hebert LE, Weuve J, Scherr PA, Evans DA. Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010–2050) estimated using the 2010 census. Neurology. 2013 May 7;80(19):1778-83. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828726f5. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
5. Polikarpov AV, Aleksandrova GA, Golubev NA, et al. General morbidity of the adult population of Russia in 2017. Part 4. M.; 2018. Available at: https://minzdrav.gov.ru/ministry/61/22/stranitsa-979/statisticheskie-i-informatsionnye-materialy/statisticheskiy-sbornik-2017-god (In Russ.).
6. Parfenov VA. Management of patients with cognitive impairment. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2023;15(1):97-102. doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2023-1-97-102 (In Russ.).
7. Yakhno NN, Tkacheva ON, Gavrilova SI, et al. Comprehensive interdisciplinary and interdepartmental program for prevention, early detection, diagnosis and treatment of cognitive disorders in older and senile people. Rossiyskiy zhurnal geriatricheskoy meditsiny = Russian Journal of Geriatric Medicine. 2022;(1):6-16. doi: 10.37586/2686-8636-1-2022-6-16 (In Russ.).
8. American Psychiartic Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association, 2013. xliv, 947 p.
9. Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al; Contributors. NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Apr;14(4):53562. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018
10. Dubois B, Villain N, Frisoni GB, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations of the International Working Group. Lancet Neurol. 2021 Jun;20(6):484-96. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00066-1. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
11. Buschke H. Cued recall in amnesia. J Clin Neuropsychol. 1984 Nov;6(4):433-40. doi: 10.1080/01688638408401233
12. Grober E, Buschke H. Genuine memory deficits in dementia. Dev Neuropsychol. 1987;3:13-36.
13. Ivnik RJ, Smith GE, Lucas JA, et al. Free and cued selective reminding test: MOANS norms. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Oct;19(5):676-91. doi: 10.1080/01688639708403753
14. Gorno-Tempini ML, Dronkers NF, Rankin KP, et al. Cognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia. Ann Neurol. 2004 Mar;55(3):335-46. doi: 10.1002/ana.10825
15. Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, et al. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology. 2011 Mar 15;76(11):1006-14. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
16. Schott JM, Crutch SJ. Posterior Cortical Atrophy. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2019 Feb;25(1):52-75. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000696
17. Crutch SJ, Schott JM, Rabinovici GD, et al. Consensus classification of posterior cortical atrophy. Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Aug;13(8):870-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
18. Lehingue E, Gueniat J, Jourdaa S, et al. Improving the Diagnosis of the Frontal Variant of Alzheimer's Disease with the DAPHNE Scale. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;79(4):1735-45. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201088
19. Mathew R, Bak TH, Hodges JR. Diagnostic criteria for corticobasal syndrome: a comparative study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;83(4):405-10. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2011300875. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
20. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. Erratum in: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Sep;67(9):1991. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15925
21. Gutorova DA, Vasenina EE, Levin OS. Screening of cognitive impairment in the old and old-old population with the 3-CT scale. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova = S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2016;116(6-2):3540. doi: 10.17116/jnevro20161166235-40 (In Russ.).
22. Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, et al. The Mini-Cog: a cognitive 'vital signs' measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000 Nov;15(11):1021-7. doi: 10.1002/10991166(200011)15:11<1021::aid-gps234>3.0.co;2-6
23. Hardy JA, Higgins GA. Alzheimer's disease: the amyloid cascade hypothesis. Science. 1992 Apr 10;256(5054):184-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1566067
24. Frisoni GB, Altomare D, Thal DR, et al. The probabilistic model of Alzheimer disease: the amyloid hypothesis revised. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2022 Jan;23(1):53-66. doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00533-w. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
25. Levin OS, Vasenina EE. Twenty-five years of the amyloid hypothesis of alzheimer disease: advances, failures and new perspectives. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova = S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2016;116(6-2):3-9. doi: 10.17116/jnevro2016116623-9 (In Russ.)].
26. Ebenau JL, Timmers T, Wesselman LMP, et al. ATN classification and clinical progression in subjective cognitive decline: The SCIENCe project. Neurology. 2020 Jul 7;95(1):e46-e58. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009724. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
27. Shevtsova KV, Rozhkov DO, Grishina DA, et al. Biological markers of Alzheimer's disease in cerebrospinal fluid: clinical and laboratory comparisons. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2024;16(3):96-102. doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2024-3-96-102 (In Russ.).
28. Parfenov VA, Grishina DA, Tyurina AYu. Alzheimer's disease: diagnosis and treatment, errors in patient management. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2024;16(2):95-100. doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2024-2-95-100 (In Russ.).
29. Grishina DA, Khayalieva NA, Grinyuk VV, Tyurina AYu. Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease by using biological markers in posterior cortical atrophy. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2024;16(2):47-53. doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2024-2-47-53 (In Russ.).
30. Lobzin VYu, Emelin AYu, Odinak MM, et al. Value of determining the cerebrospinal fluid protein markers of amyloidosis and neurodegeneration in the diagnosis of vascular and neurodegenerative cognitive impairments. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2013;5(4):21-7. doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2013-2450 (In Russ.).
31. Scheltens P, Leys D, Barkhof F, et al. Atrophy of medial temporal lobes on MRI in “probable” Alzheimer's disease and normal ageing: diagnostic value and neuropsychological correlates. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Oct;55(10):967-72. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.10.967
32. Xiong X, He H, Ye Q, et al. Alzheimer's disease diagnostic accuracy by fluid and neuroimaging ATN framework. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024 Feb;30(2):e14357. doi: 10.1111/cns.14357. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
33. Litvinenko IV, Emelin AYu, Lobzin VYu, Kolmakova KA. Neuroimaging techniques for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease and cere-brovascular diseases with cognitive impairment. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2019;11(3S):18-25. doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2019-3S-18-25 (In Russ.).
34. Caminiti SP, Ballarini T, Sala A, et al; BIOMARKAPD Project. FDG-PET and CSF biomarker accuracy in prediction of conversion to different dementias in a large multicentre MCI cohort. Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Jan 28;18:167-77. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.019
35. Levin F, Ferreira D, Lange C, et al; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Data-driven FDG-PET subtypes of Alzheimer's disease-related neurodegeneration. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021 Feb 19;13(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13195-021-00785-9
36. Briggs R, Kennelly SP, O'Neill D. Drug treatments in Alzheimer's disease. Clin Med (Lond). 2016 Jun;16(3):247-53. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-3-247
37. Raschetti R, Albanese E, Vanacore N, Maggini M. Cholinesterase inhibitors in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review of randomised trials. PLoS Med. 2007 Nov 27;4(11):e338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040338
38. Atri A. Current and Future Treatments in Alzheimer's Disease. Semin Neurol. 2019 Apr;39(2):227-40. doi: 10.1055/s-00391678581. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
39. Gromova DO. New in the therapy of Alzheimer's disease. Povedencheskaya nevrologiya = Behavioral Neurology. 2021;(2):48-55. doi: 10.46393/2712-9675_2021_2_48_55 (In Russ.).
40. Avgerinos KI, Ferrucci L, Kapogiannis D. Effects of monoclonal antibodies against amyloid- on clinical and biomarker outcomes and adverse event risks: A systematic review and meta-analysis of phase III RCTs in Alzheimer's disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2021 Jul;68:101339. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101339. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
41. Van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, et al. Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease. N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 5;388(1):9-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212948. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
Review
For citations:
Bogolepova AN, Vasenina EE, Vakhnina NV, Vorobyеv SV, Gavrilova SI, Emelin АY, Zakharov VV, Illarioshkin SN, Kosivtsova OV, Kostyuk GP, Levin OS, Mkhitaryan EA, Parfenov VА, Tkacheva ON, Shpilyukova YA. Resolution of the Expert Council on the problem of early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2024;16(5):111-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2024-5-111-119