Impact of the physical rehabilitation onset time in early recovery period of ischemic stroke (second stage of medical rehabilitation) on the level of daily activity and independence
https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2021-6-41-47
Abstract
Ischemic stroke (IS) is the leading cause of neurological inpatient care, readmission, and long-term disability. Until now, there is no single point of view on when the second stage of medical rehabilitation after an IS should be started and the amount of the rehabilitation activities.
Objective: to compare the effectiveness of the course of motor rehabilitation during the first 30–90 days and 91–180 days after IS.
Patients and methods. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 included 44 patients in whom ≤3 months passed from IS onset, and group 2–39 patients in whom >3 but <6 months have passed since the IS onset. All patients included in the study received physiotherapy exercises, simulator exercises, robotic mechanotherapy, physiotherapy, massage, speech therapy, cognitive training, and secondary IS prevention.
Results and discussion. In both groups patients got a positive treatment result: a significant increase in muscle strength, gait stability, quality, and speed. The number of patients who achieved independence (≤2 points on the Rankin scale) before the start of the rehabilitation course among patients of group 1 was 9.4%, after the end of the course – 40.6%. More initially independent patients were included in the group 2 – 28.6%; after a course of rehabilitation, the proportion of independent patients increased to 35.7%.
Conclusion. Rehabilitation courses are effective in patients who have had IS, both in the first three months and in the period from the 4th to the 6th month. It is advisable to conduct the second stage of medical rehabilitation earlier after a stroke.
About the Authors
S. V. KotovRussian Federation
61/2, Shchepkina St., Build. 1, Moscow 129110, Russia
L. H. Kodzokova
Russian Federation
61/2, Shchepkina St., Build. 1, Moscow 129110, Russia
E. V. Isakova
Russian Federation
61/2, Shchepkina St., Build. 1, Moscow 129110, Russia
A. S. Kotov
Russian Federation
61/2, Shchepkina St., Build. 1, Moscow 129110, Russia
References
1. Skvortsova VI, Shetova IM, Kakorina EP, et al. Results of implementation of a «Complex of measures to improve medical care for patients with stroke in the Russian Federation». Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2018;118(4):5-12. doi: 10.17116/jnevro2018118415-12 (In Russ.).
2. Krumholz HM, Normand SL, Wang Y. Trends in hospitalizations and outcomes for acute cardiovascular disease and stroke, 1999–2011. Circulation. 2014 Sep 16;130(12):966-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007787. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
3. Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, et al. Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 22;2014(4):CD001920. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001920.pub3
4. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47(6):e98-e169. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098
5. Jette AM. The Importance of Dose of a Rehabilitation Intervention. Phys Ther. 2017 Nov 1;97(11):1043. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx085
6. Kotov SV, Isakova EV, Lijdvoy VYu, et al. Robotic recovery of walking function in patients in the early recovery period of stroke. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2020;120(8-2):73-80. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202012008273 (In Russ.).
7. Stinear C. Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(12):1228-32. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70247-7
8. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1693-702. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5
9. Kasner SE. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol. 2006 Jul;5(7):603-12. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70495-1
10. Huybrechts KF, Caro JJ. The Barthel Index and modified Rankin Scale as prognostic tools for long-term outcomes after stroke: a qualitative review of the literature. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jul;23(7):1627-36. doi: 10.1185/030079907x210444
11. Jang MU, Kang J, Kim BJ, et al. In-Hospital and Post-Discharge Recovery after Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Nationwide Multicenter Stroke Registry-base Study. J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Sep 23;34(36):e240. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e240
12. Musa KI, Keegan TJ. The change of Barthel Index scores from the time of discharge until 3-month post-discharge among acute stroke patients in Malaysia: A random intercept model. PLoS One. 2018 Dec 20;13(12):e0208594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208594. eCollection 2018.
13. Hu L, Liu G. Effects of early rehabilitation nursing on neurological functions and quality of life of patients with ischemic stroke hemiplegia. Am J Transl Res. 2021 Apr 15;13(4):3811-8. eCollection 2021.
14. Kong KH, Lee J. Temporal recovery of activities of daily living in the first year after ischemic stroke: a prospective study of patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014 Jan 1;35(2):221-6. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141110
15. Zhang M, Wang Q, Jiang Y, et al. Optimization of Early Mobilization Program for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: An Orthogonal Design. Front Neurol. 2021 Apr 12;12:645811. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.645811. eCollection 2021.
16. Bernhardt J, English C, Johnson L, Cumming TB. Early mobilization after stroke: early adoption but limited evidence. Stroke. 2015 Apr;46(4):1141-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007434. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
17. Rethnam V, Hayward KS, Bernhardt J, Churilov L. Early Mobilization After Stroke: Do Clinical Practice Guidelines Support Clinicians' Decision-Making? Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 5;12:606525. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.606525. eCollection 2021.
18. Langhorne P, Wu O, Rodgers H, et al. A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial after stroke (AVERT): a Phase III, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess. 2017 Sep;21(54):1-120. doi: 10.3310/hta21540
19. Xu T, Yu X, Ou S, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Very Early Mobilization in Patients with Acute Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 26;7(1):6550. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06871-z
20. Cantone M, Lanza G, Puglisi V, et al. Hypertensive Crisis in Acute Cerebrovascular Diseases Presenting at the Emergency Department: A Narrative Review. Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 7;11(1):70. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010070
21. Minhas JS, Wang X, Lavados PM, et al; HeadPoST Investigators. Blood pressure variability and outcome in acute ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke: a post hoc analysis of the HeadPoST study. J Hum Hypertens. 2019 May;33(5):411-8. doi: 10.1038/s41371-019-0193-z. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
22. Geng X, Wang Q, Lee H, et al. Remote Ischemic Postconditioning vs. Physical Exercise After Stroke: an Alternative Rehabilitation Strategy? Mol Neurobiol. 2021 Jul;58(7):3141-57. doi: 10.1007/s12035-021-02329-6. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
23. Clarkson AN, Huang BS, Macisaac SE, et al. Reducing excessive GABA-mediated tonic inhibition promotes functional recovery after stroke. Nature. 2010 Nov 11;468(7321):305-9. doi: 10.1038/nature09511. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
24. Krakauer JW, Carmichael ST, Corbett D, Wittenberg GF. Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Oct;26(8):923-31. doi: 10.1177/1545968312440745. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
Review
For citations:
Kotov S.V., Kodzokova L.H., Isakova E.V., Kotov A.S. Impact of the physical rehabilitation onset time in early recovery period of ischemic stroke (second stage of medical rehabilitation) on the level of daily activity and independence. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2021;13(6):41-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2021-6-41-47