Rehabilitation of patients after lumbar microdiscectomy
https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2021-4-60-65
Abstract
Objective: to investigate movement-based therapy (kinesitherapy) effectiveness in the rehabilitation of patients after lumbar microdiscectomy.
Patients and methods. We enrolled 90 patients (33 men and 57 women, mean age — 59.78±12.0 years) after lumbar microdiscectomy due to the ineffectiveness of conservative management of discogenic lumbosacral radiculopathy. One-half of the participants (45 patients: 15 men and 30 women, mean age — 60.24±12.0 years) underwent kinesitherapy under the supervision of a physician; in other 45 patients (18 men and 27 women, mean age — 59.33±11.0 years), kinesitherapy was not included in the radiculopathy treatment protocol. We assessed pain intensity with visual analogue scale (VAS) and disability using the Roland-Morris scale (RMS) before surgery, ten days after the surgery, and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.
Results and discussion. We observed a significant decrease in pain intensity - up to 4 points on the VAS, and an improvement in activities of daily living up to 10 points on the RMS 10 days after microdiscectomy. After six months, there was a decrease in pain intensity according to the VAS to 2 points in the kinesitherapy group and to 3 points in the group without kinesitherapy (p=0.088), as well as an improvement in activities of daily living according to RMS up to 5 points in the kinesitherapy group and up to 8 points in the group without kinesitherapy (p=0.003). Reoperations were required in two of 45 patients in the group without kinesitherapy (4.4%) and in one of 45 patients (2.2%) in the kinesitherapy group (p≥0.05).
Conclusion. Kinesitherapy can improve functional recovery in patients after lumbar microdiscectomy.
About the Authors
V. S. ProkopovichRussian Federation
Vladislav Sergeyevich Prokopovich.
11, Rossolimo St., Build. 1, Moscow 119021.
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest.
V. A. Parfenov
Russian Federation
11, Rossolimo St., Build. 1, Moscow 119021.
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
1. Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015 Aug 22;386(9995):743-800. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
2. Driscoll T, Jacklyn G, Orchard J, et al. The global burden of occupationally related low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):975-81. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204631. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
3. Podchufarova EV, Yakhno NN. Bol' v spine [Back pain]. Moscow; 2010 (In Russ.).
4. Parfenov VA, Isaikin AI. Boli v poyasnichnoy oblasti [Low back pain]. Moscow; 2018 (In Russ.).
5. Stochkendahl MJ, Kjaer P, Hartvigsen J, et al. National Clinical Guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy. Eur Spine J. 2018 Jan;27(1):60-75. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5099-2
6. Parfenov VA, Yakhno NN, Davydov OS, et al. Discogenic lumbosacral radiculopathy. Recommendations of the Russian Association for the Study of Pain (RSSP). Nevrologiya, neyropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2020;12(4):15-24. doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2020-4-15-24 (In Russ.).
7. Berry JA, Elia C, Saini HS, et al. A Review of Lumbar Radiculopathy, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Cureus. 2019;11(10):e5934. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5934
8. Clark R, Weber RP, Kahwati L. Surgical Management of Lumbar Radiculopathy: a Systematic Review. Gen Intern Med. 2019;35(3):855-64. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05476-8
9. Chiu CC, Chuang TY, Chang KH, et al. The probability of spontaneous regression of lumbar herniated disc: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Feb;29(2):184-95. doi: 10.1177/0269215514540919
10. Yang X, Zhang Q, Hao X, et al. Spontaneous regression of herniated lumbar discs: Report of one illustrative case and review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;143:86-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clineu-ro.2016.02.020
11. Zhong M, Liu JT, Jiang H, et al. Incidence of Spontaneous Resorption of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis. Pain Phys J. Jan-Feb 2017;20(1):E45-E52.
12. Sucuoglu H, Barut AYY. Clinical and Radiological Follow-Up Results of Patients with Sequestered Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Prospective Cohort Study. Med Princ Pract. 2021;30:244-52. doi: 10.1159/000515308
13. Kreiner DS, Hwang SW, Easa JE, et al. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. Spine J. 2014;14(1):180-91. doi: 10.1016/j.spi-nee.2013.08.003
14. Jacobs WCH, Arts MP, van Tulder MW, et al. Surgical techniques for sciatica due to herniated disc , a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:2232-51. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2422-9
15. Oosterhuis T, Costa LOP, Maher CG, et al. Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 14;2014(3):CD003007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003007.pub3
16. Alentado VJ, Lubelski D, Steinmetz M, et al. Optimal duration of conservative management prior to surgery for cervical and lumbar radiculopathy: a literature review. Global Spine J. 2014 Dec;4(4):279-86. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1387807. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
17. Van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Verhagen AP, et al. Exercise therapy for chronic nonspecific low-back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Apr;24(2):193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2010.01.002
18. Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, et al. Nonpharmacologic therapies for low back pain: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):493-505. doi: 10.7326/M16-2459. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
19. Malfliet A, Ickmans K, Huysmans E, et al. Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 3: Low Back Pain. J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 19;8(7):1063. doi: 10.3390/jcm8071063
20. Rushton A, Heneghan NR, Heymans MW, et al. Clinical course of pain and disability following primary lumbar discectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2020 Jul;29(7):1660-70. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06272-y. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
21. Den Boer JJ, Oostendorp RA, Beems T, et al. A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(5):527-36. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0910-x
22. Sabnis AB, Diwan AD. The timing of surgery in lumbar disc prolapse: a systematic review. Indian J Orthop. 2014;48(2):127-35. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.128740
23. Schoenfeld AJBM. Does surgical timing influence functional recovery after lumbar discectomy? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):1963-70. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3505-1
24. Lindback Y, Tropp H, Enthoven P, et al. Prepare: pre-surgery physiotherapy for patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2018 Aug;18(8):1347-55. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
25. Fors M, Enthoven P, Abbott A, Oberg B. Effects of pre-surgery physiotherapy on walking ability and lower extremity strength in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder: Secondary outcomes of the PREPARE randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Oct 24;20(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2850-3
26. Ivanova MA, Parfenov VA, Isaikin AI. Conservative treatment for patients with discogenic lumbosacral radiculopathy: results of a prospective follow-up. Nevrologiya, neyropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2018;10(3):59-65. doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2018-3-59-65 (In Russ.).
27. Andersen SB, Birkelund R, Andersen M, et al. Factors Affecting Patient Decision-making on Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 20 19 Jan 15;44(2):143-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002763
Review
For citations:
Prokopovich VS, Parfenov VA. Rehabilitation of patients after lumbar microdiscectomy. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2021;13(4):60-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2021-4-60-65