Rehabilitation in acute stroke from the point of view of evidence-based medicine: possibilities of drug treatment
Abstract
The review highlights the fundamental principles of early rehabilitation in ischemic stroke, the benefits and risks of early and very early patient mobilization. It presents data on the efficiency of CIMT-kinesiotherapy and mirror therapy in restoring upper extremity function, as well as procedures for nonpharmacological correction of spatial neglect syndrome. The effect on the rehabilitation of concomitant Alzheimer's disease is analyzed. The areas of pharmacological potentiation of poststroke rehabilitation, the efficiency of cerebrolysin in particular, are considered.
About the Author
A. A. Kulesh
Acad. E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia;
City Clinical Hospital Four
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
26, Petropavlovskaya St., Perm 614990;
2, Kim St., Perm 614107
References
1. kvortsova VI, Shetova IM, Kakorina EP, et al. Reduction of mortality from acute cerebrovascular disorders as a result of the implementation of a set of measures to improve medical care for patients with vascular diseases in the Russian Federation. Profilakticheskaya meditsina. 2018; 21(1):4-10. (In Russ.).
2. Bushkova YuV. Neurorehabilitation based on the principles of evidence-based medicine: Austrian recommendations for rehabilitation of stroke patients. Farmateka. 2019;26(3):20-6. (In Russ.).
3. Shmonin AA, Mal'tseva MN, Mel'nikova EV, Ivanova GE. Basic principles of medical rehabilitation, rehabilitation diagnosis in the ICF categories and rehabilitation plan. Vestnik vosstanovitel'noi meditsiny. 2017;(2):16-22. (In Russ.).
4. Parfenov VA, Verbitskaya SV. Management of a post-stroke patient. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2013;5(2S):23-7. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2013-2355
5. Belkin AA, Avdyunina AA, Varako NA, et al. Rehabilitation in intensive care: clinical recommendations. Vestnik vosstanovitel'noi meditsiny. 2017;(2):139-43. (In Russ.).
6. Bernhardt J, Godecke E, Johnson L, Langhorne P. Early rehabilitation after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol. 2017 Feb;30(1):48-54. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000404.
7. Coleman ER, Moudgal R, Lang K, et al. Early Rehabilitation After Stroke: a Narrative Review. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017 Nov 7; 19(12):59. doi: 10.1007/s11883-017-0686-6.
8. Zeiler SR. Should We Care About Early PostStroke Rehabilitation? Not Yet, but Soon. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019 Feb 20;19(3):13. doi: 10.1007/s11910-019-0927-x.
9. Bernhardt J, Dewey HM, Thrift AG, Donnan GA. Inactive and alone: physical activity within the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care. Stroke. 2004 Apr;35(4):1005-9. Epub 2004 Feb 26.
10. AVERT Trial Collaboration group. Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):46-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60690-0. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
11. Bernhardt J, Churilov L, Ellery F, et al. Prespecified dose response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT). Neurology. 2016 Jun 7;86(23):2138-45. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002459. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
12. Herisson F, Godard S, Volteau C, et al. Early sitting in ischemic stroke patients (SEVEL): a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 29;11(3):e0149466. doi: 10.1371 journal.pone.0149466. eCollection 2016.
13. Langhorne P, Collier JM, Bate PJ, et al. Very early versus delayed mobilisation after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 16;10:CD006187. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD006187.pub3.
14. Tong Y, Cheng Z, Rajah GB, Duan H, et al. High Intensity Physical Rehabilitation Later Than 24 h Post Stroke Is Beneficial in Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Study in Mild to Moderate Ischemic Stroke. Front Neurol. 2019 Feb 19;10:113. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00113. eCollection 2019.
15. Wolf S, Winstein C, Miller J, et al. Eff ect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006 Nov 1;296(17):2095-104.
16. Kwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, van Wegen EE, Wolf SL. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Feb;14(2):224- 34. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70160-7.
17. Kwakkel G, Winters C, van Wegen EE, et al. Effects of Unilateral Upper Limb Training in Two Distinct Prognostic Groups Early After Stroke: The EXPLICIT-Stroke Randomized Clinical Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Oct;30(9):804-16. doi: 10.1177/1545968315624784. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
18. Liu XH, Huai J, Gao J, et al. Constraintinduced movement therapy in treatment of acute and sub acute stroke: a meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials. Neural Regen Res. 2017 Sep;12(9):1443-1450. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.215255.
19. Thieme H, Morkisch N, Mehrholz J, et al. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 11;7:CD008449. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD008449.pub3.
20. Deconinck FJ, Smorenburg AR, Benham A, et al. Reflections on mirror therapy: A systematic review of the effect of mirror visual feedback on the brain. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 May;29(4):349-61. doi: 10.1177/1545968314546134. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
21. Zhang JJQ, Fong KNK, Welage N, Liu KPY. The Activation of the Mirror Neuron System during Action Observation and Action Execution with Mirror Visual Feedback in Stroke: A Systematic Review. Neural Plast. 2018 Apr 24;2018:2321045. doi: 10.1155/2018/2321045. eCollection 2018.
22. Perez-Cruzado D, Merchan-Baeza JA, Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Systematic review of mirror therapy compared with conventional rehabilitation in upper extremity function in stroke survivors. Aust Occup Ther J. 2017 Apr;64(2):91-112. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12342. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
23. Kamtchum Tatuene J, Allali G, Saj A, et al. Incidence, Risk Factors and Anatomy of Peripersonal Visuospatial Neglect in Acute Stroke. Eur Neurol. 2016;75(3-4):157-63. doi: 10.1159/000444709. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
24. Barrett AM, Houston KE. Update on the Clinical Approach to Spatial Neglect. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019 Apr 4;19(5):25. doi: 10.1007/s11910-019-0940-0.
25. Grigor'eva VN, Sorokina TA. Anosognosia in patients with acute hemispheric ischemic stroke. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2016; 8(2):31-5. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2016-2-31-35
26. Azouvi P, Jacquin-Courtois S, Luaut ОJ. Rehabilitation of unilateral neglect: Evidencebased medicine. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;60(3):191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
27. Pandian JD, Arora R, Kaur P, et al. Mirror therapy in unilateral neglect after stroke (MUST trial): a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2014 Sep 9;83(11):1012-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000773. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
28. Ianes P, Varalta V, Gandolfi M, et al. Stimulating visual exploration of the neglected space in the early stage of stroke by hemifield eye-patching: a randomized controlled trial in patients with right brain damage. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012 Jun;48(2):189-96. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
29. Machner B, Konemund I, Sprenger A, et al. Randomized controlled trial on hemifield eye patching and optokinetic stimulation in acute spatial neglect. Stroke. 2014 Aug;45(8):2465-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006059. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
30. Champod AS, Frank RC, Taylor K, Eskes GA. The effects of prism adaptation on daily life activities in patients with visuospatial neglect: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018 Jun;28(4):491-514. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2016.1182032. Epub 2016 May 16.
31. Firth N, Barker RN, Hayward KS, et al. Safety and efficacy of recovery-promoting drugs for motor function after stroke: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Rehabil Med. 2019 May 13;51(5):319-330. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2536.
32. Brainin M. Cerebrolysin: a multi-target drug for recovery after stroke. Expert Rev Neurother. 2018 Aug;18(8):681-687. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2018.1500459. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
33. Gromova OA, Pronin AV, Torshin IYu, et al. Neurotrophic and antioxidant potential of neuropeptides and trace elements. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2015;7(4):92-100. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2015-4-92-100
34. Chukanova EI, Chukanova AS. Chronic cerebral ischemia, neuroplasticity, possibilities of therapy. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2017;9(2):102-7. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2017-2-102-107
35. Heiss WD, Brainin M, Bornstein NM, et al. Cerebrolysin Acute Stroke Treatment in Asia (CASTA) Investigators. Cerebrolysin in patients with acute ischemic stroke in Asia: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Stroke. 2012 Mar;43(3):630-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.628537. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
36. Muresanu DF, Heiss WD, Hoemberg V, et al. Cerebrolysin and Recovery After Stroke (CARS): A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, DoubleBlind, Multicenter Trial. Stroke. 2016 Jan;47(1): 151-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009416. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
37. Kustova MA, Tolmachev AP, Shamalov NA. Effect of cerebrolysin on motor function restoration during medical rehabilitation. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2016;8(2):80-6. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2016-2-80-86
38. Guekht A, Vester J, Heiss WD, et al. Safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin in motor function recovery after stroke: a meta-analysis of the CARS trials. Neurol Sci. 2017 Oct;38(10): 1761-1769. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-3037-z. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
39. Bornstein NM, Guekht A, Vester J, et al. Safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin in early post-stroke recovery: a meta-analysis of nine randomized clinical trials. Neurol Sci. 2018 Apr; 39(4):629-640. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-3214-0. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
40. Chang WH, Park CH, Kim DY, et al. Cerebrolysin combined with rehabilitation promotes motor recovery in patients with severe motor impairment after stroke. BMC Neurol. 2016 Mar 2;16:31. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0553-z.
For citation:
Kulesh A.A. Rehabilitation in acute stroke from the point of view of evidence-based medicine: possibilities of drug treatment. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2019;11(3):99-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2019-3-99-103
Views: 436
Email this article 