Preview

Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics

Advanced search

Factors determining social (interpersonal) support in patients with vertebro-spinal cord injury

https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2016-1-43-48

Full Text:

Abstract

Objective: to study relationships between the specific features of the social network of patients with vertebro-spinal cord injury sequels (VSIS), subjectively perceived and actual social support, and social skills assessment by the patients.

Patients and methods. In 2014–2015, a psychodiagnostic study was conducted in 41 VSIS patients (32 men and 9 women), including 18- to 20-year-olds (n=5), 21- to 30-year-olds (n=18), 31- to 40-year-olds (n=9), 41- to 50-year-olds (n=4), and patients over 50 years of age (n=5). Paraplegia (paraparesis) and tetraplegia (tetraparesis) were present in 30 and 11 patients, respectively. The duration of VSIS was 1 to 125 months. Correlations between different types of subjectively perceived and actual social support and the parameters of a social network of the patients were assessed.

Results. Correlation analysis has showed that there is a need for psychotherapeutic interventions related to social network extension for patients so that the latter should have sufficient and persistent interpersonal support.

About the Authors

I. D. Boulyubash
Volga Federal Medical Research Centre, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia 18/1, Verkhnevolzhskaya Embankment, Nizhny Novgorod 603155
Russian Federation


O. S. Bashta
Volga Federal Medical Research Centre, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia 18/1, Verkhnevolzhskaya Embankment, Nizhny Novgorod 603155
Russian Federation


References

1. Силантьева ТА. Операционализация конструкта «социальная поддержка». Современная зарубежная психология. 2014;3(4):57-67. [Silant'eva TA. The operationalization of the construct «social support». Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya. 2014;3(4):57-67. (In Russ.)].

2. Schwarzer R, Lippke S, Luszczynska A. Mechanisms of health behavior change in persons with chronic illness or disability: the health action process approach (HAPA). Rehabil Psychol. 2011 Aug;56(3):161-70. doi: 10.1037/a0024509.

3. Wills TA, Shinar O. Measuring perceived and received social support. Social support measurement and intervention: a guide for health and social scientists. Cohen S, Underwood LG, Gottlieb BH, editors. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. P. 86-135.

4. Крюкова ТЛ, Куфтяк ЕВ. Опросник способов совладания (адаптация методики WCQ). Журнал практического психолога. 2007;(3):93-112. [Kryukova TL, Kuftyak EV. Questionnaire ways of coping (adaptation techniques WCQ). Zhurnal prakticheskogo psikhologa. 2007;(3):93-112. (In Russ.)].

5. Торчинская, ЕЕ. Роль ценностно-смысловых образований личности в адаптации к хроническому стрессу (на примере спинальных больных). Психологический журнал. 2001;22(2):27-35. [Torchinskaya, EE. The role of value-semantic structures of personality in adaptation to chronic stress (for example, spinal patients). Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2001;22(2):27-35. (In Russ.)].

6. Hobfoll SE. The Influence of Culture, Community and the Nested-self in the Stress process: Advancing Conservation of Resources Theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/10.1111/1464-597.00062/abstract

7. Gottlieb, B.H., Bergen, A.E. Social support concepts and measures J Psychosom Res. 2010 Nov;69(5):511-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores. 2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

8. Матрехина НВ. Социальная сеть человека в контексте его жизненных ситуаций. Автореф. дисс. канд. психол. наук. Санкт-Петербург; 2006. [Matrekhina NV. Social network of the person in the context of their life situations. Autoref. diss. cand. psych. sci. Saint-Petersburg; 2006.]

9. Brown S, Nesse R, Vinokur A, Smith D. Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychol Sci. 2003 Jul;14(4):320-7.

10. Chronister JA, Johnson EK, Berven NL. Measuring social support in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Jan 30;28(2):75-84.

11. Sarason IG, Sarason BR, Shearin EN, Pierce GR. A brief measure of social support: practical and theoretical implications. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 1987;(4):497-610.

12. O'Hare MA, Wallis L, Murphy GC. Social Support Pairs Predict Daily Functioning Following Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: An Exploratory Study. The Open Rehab. J. 2011;(4)51-8.

13. Казьмина ОЮ. Структурно-динамические особенности систем межличностных взаимодействий у больных юношеской прогредиенной шизофренией. Дисс. канд. псих. наук. Москва; 1997. [Kaz'mina OYu. Structural and dynamic features of the systems of interpersonal interactions among the patients with juvenile schizophrenia progrediens. Diss. cand. psych. sci. Moscow; 1997.]

14. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J. Person. Ass. 1988;52(1):30-41.

15. Barrera MJ, Baca LM. Recipient reactions to social support: Contributions of enacted support, conflicted support and network orientation. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 1990;7(4):541-51.

16. Goldstein AP, Sprafkin RP, Gershaw NJ. Skill Training for Community Living Applying Structured Learning Therapy. New-York: Pergamon Press; 1976.

17. Angel S, Buus N. The experience of being a partner to a spinal cord injured person: A phenomenological- hermeneutic study. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2011;6(4). doi: 10.3402/qhw.v6i4.7199. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

18. Chandler M, Kennedy P, Sandhu N. The Association Between Threat Appraisals and Psychological Adjustment in Partners of People with Spinal Cord Injury. Rehab. Psychol. 2007;52(4):325-32.


For citation:


Boulyubash I.D., Bashta O.S. Factors determining social (interpersonal) support in patients with vertebro-spinal cord injury. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2016;8(1):43-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2016-1-43-48

Views: 281


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-2711 (Print)
ISSN 2310-1342 (Online)