Preview

Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics

Advanced search

Ocrelizumab in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: real-world clinical practice experience in the Yaroslavl region

https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2026-1-57-64

Abstract

   The most significant results in terms of efficacy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) and primary progressive MS have been demonstrated for the drug ocrelizumab. Despite the significant role of randomised clinical trials in the study of the drug, the accumulation of experience in the real-world clinical practice of using ocrelizumab broadens the understanding of the drug's importance in the treatment of MS.

   Objective: to investigate the use of ocrelizumab in patients with MS living in the Yaroslavl region, as well as immunological predictors of ocrelizumab efficacy.

   Material and methods. The study included data from 107 patients diagnosed with MS according to the 2017 McDonald criteria (33 men and 74 women; median age – 42.1 [34.5; 49.7] years), with a disease duration of 10.3 [6.7; 16.9] years, and duration of therapy prior to starting ocrelizumab of 36.6 [25.9; 47.8] months. The efficacy and safety of therapy were analysed over 24 months of treatment.

   Results. A significant reduction in the frequency of exacerbations over 24 months of therapy was observed in the overall cohort of patients, from 0.53 to 0.10 per year (Z = 4.06; p < 0.001), and in MRI activity – from 1.38 to 0.09 new lesions on T2 images per year (Z = 3.88; p < 0.001). The overall NEDA-3 rate over 24 months of therapy was 76.64 %. It has been shown that a CD19+ level above 20 cells/ml before the second infusion of the drug may indicate the onset of disease activity in the following 18 months.

   Conclusion. The data obtained confirm the three-year efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab. The treatment has been shown to have a positive effect on NEDA-3 status.

About the Authors

D. S. Kasatkin
Yaroslavl State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Dmitry Sergeyevich Kasatkin

150000; 5, Revolyutsionnaya St.; Yaroslavl


Competing Interests:

There are no conflicts of interest



E. V. Kiseleva
Yaroslavl State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

150000; 5, Revolyutsionnaya St.; Yaroslavl


Competing Interests:

There are no conflicts of interest



I. O. Stepanov
Yaroslavl State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

150000; 5, Revolyutsionnaya St.; Yaroslavl


Competing Interests:

There are no conflicts of interest



N. N. Spirina
Yaroslavl State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

150000; 5, Revolyutsionnaya St.; Yaroslavl


Competing Interests:

There are no conflicts of interest



References

1. Frisch ES, Pretzsch R, Weber MS. A Milestone in Multiple Sclerosis Therapy: Monoclonal Antibodies Against CD20-Yet Progress Continues. Neurotherapeutics. 2021 Jul;18(3):1602-22. doi: 10.1007/s13311-021-01048-z

2. Klein C, Lammens A, Schäfer W, et al. Epitope interactions of monoclonal antibodies targeting CD20 and their relationship to functional properties. MAbs. 2013 Jan-Feb;5(1):22-33. doi: 10.4161/mabs.22771

3. Montalban X, Hauser SL, Kappos L, et al. ORATORIO Clinical Investigators. Ocrelizumab versus Placebo in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 19;376(3):209-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606468

4. Montalban X, Matthews PM, Simpson A, et al. Real-world evaluation of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis : A systematic review. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2023 Mar;10(3):302-11. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51732

5. Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Comi G, et al.; OPERA I and OPERA II Clinical Investigators. Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 19;376(3):221-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601277

6. Boyko OV, Petrov SV, Lashch NYu, et al. Experience with anti-B-cell therapy in the pathogenetic treatment of multiple sclerosis. Neurologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika= Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2019;11(1):59-65 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2019-1-59-65

7. Popova EV, Ryabov SA. The experience of using ocrelizumab in routine practice. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2020;(2):76-80 (In Russ.). doi: 10.21518/2079-701X-2020-2-76-80

8. Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Feb;17(2):162-73. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2

9. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52. doi: 10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444

10. Giovannoni G, Tomic D, Bright JR, Havrdova E. “No evident disease activity”: The use of combined assessments in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2017 Aug;23(9):1179-87. doi: 10.1177/1352458517703193

11. Wolinsky JS, Montalban X, Hauser SL, et al. Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial. Ann Neurol. 2018 Oct;84(4):527-36. doi: 10.1002/ana.25313

12. Sharrad D, Chugh P, Slee M, Bacchi S. Defining progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) in adult patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis : A systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Oct;78:104899. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104899

13. Bayas A, Christ M, Faissner S, et al. Disease-modifying therapies for relapsing/active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis – a review of population-specific evidence from randomized clinical trials. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2023 Jan 24;16:17562864221146836. doi: 10.1177/17562864221146836

14. Houtchens M, Howard D. Ocrelizumab in highly disabled progressive multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2024 Feb;82:105345. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.105345

15. Cellerino M, Boffa G, Lapucci C, et al. Predictors of Ocrelizumab Effectiveness in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics. 2021 Oct;18(4):2579-88. doi: 10.1007/s13311-021-01104-8

16. Erdogan T, Cansu C, Kocer B, et al. Realworld effectiveness, safety and immunogenicity of ocrelizumab in turkish multiple sclerosis patients: a single-center experience for 4-year follow-up. Acta Neurol Belg. 2024 Aug;124(4):1385-91. doi: 10.1007/s13760-024-02572-3

17. Santiago-Setien P, Barquin-Rego C, Hernandez-Martinez P, et al. Switch to ocrelizumab in MS patients treated with natalizumab in extended interval dosing at high risk of PML: A 96-week follow-up pilot study. Front Immunol. 2023 Feb 1;14:1086028. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1086028

18. Vermersch P, De Seze J, Clavelou P, et al. Expert opinion: Criteria for second-line treatment failure in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Nov;36:101406. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101406

19. Ellwardt E, Rolfes L, Klein J, et al. Ocrelizumab initiation in patients with MS: A multicenter observational study. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020 Apr 9;7(4):e719. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000719

20. Brown JD, Muston BT, Massey J. Switching from natalizumab to an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis : A systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2024 Jun;86:105605. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105605

21. Chisari CG, Bianco A, Brescia Morra V, et al. Italian MS Registry. Effectiveness of Ocrelizumab in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: a Multicenter, Retrospective, Realworld Study (OPPORTUNITY). Neurotherapeutics. 2023 Oct;20(6):1696-706. doi: 10.1007/s13311-023-01415-y

22. Lamb YN. Ocrelizumab : A Review in Multiple Sclerosis. Drugs. 2022 Feb;82(3):323-34. doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01672-9

23. Prockl V, Nickel FT, Utz KS, et al. Real world application of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis: Single-center experience of 128 patients. J Neurol Sci. 2020 Aug 15;415:116973. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116973

24. Spirin NN, Kasatkin DS, Stepanov IO, et al. Side-effects of the treatment with disease modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis: an analysis of register data in the Yaroslavl region. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2012;112(8):27-33 (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Kasatkin DS, Kiseleva EV, Stepanov IO, Spirina NN. Ocrelizumab in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: real-world clinical practice experience in the Yaroslavl region. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2026;18(1):57-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2026-1-57-64

Views: 355

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-2711 (Print)
ISSN 2310-1342 (Online)