Results of medical and social research and assessment of quality of life in myasthenia gravis
https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2025-5-11-20
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is one of the most common autoimmune diseases of the nervous system. Medical and social analysis of the patient population structure and assessment of their quality of life (QoL) as one of the criteria for the effectiveness of treatment are of great importance for evaluating the condition of patients and the directions of development of specialised care.
Objective: to analyse the quality of life of patients diagnosed with MG.
Material and methods. The study involved 662 patients with MG from 26 regions of Russia. A specially designed medical and social questionnaire and the SF-36 questionnaire were used.
Results. In Russia, women and middle-aged and elderly people predominate among MG patients. MG is characterised by a relatively favourable course (less than half of patients have any form of disability). Almost two-thirds of patients have other chronic diseases. About 90% of MG patients receive drug therapy, but almost half of patients have problems obtaining their prescribed medication. In addition to a significant decrease in physical activity, there is also a decrease in the mental state of patients associated with various physical disorders, as well as fear of the future (fear of symptom recurrence, risk of being left without support and unable to perform daily tasks, the need for lifelong treatment). Among the symptoms of MG that affect the emotional state of patients, weakness and rapid fatigue are in first place, followed by bulbar dysfunction. The role functioning of patients with MG depends to a greater extent on their physical condition and to a lesser extent on their emotional state. Those receiving regular drug therapy had significantly better indicators than those who were not treated. The SF-36 scale assessment confirmed that physical condition and physical functioning, which influence the psychological components of QoL assessment, are crucial for QoL in MG.
Conclusion. A significant decrease in QoL indicators was noted in MG, primarily in the physical component and, secondarily, in psychological health. All this points to the need for early initiation of highly effective pathogenetic therapy, in particular with modern C5-complement inhibitors.
About the Authors
Ya. V. VlasovRussian Federation
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery
89, Chapaevskaya St., Samara 443099
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
Yu. A. Merkulov
Russian Federation
8, Baltiyskaya St., Moscow 125315
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
V. M. Alifirova
Russian Federation
2, Moskovskiy High Road, Tomsk 634050
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
M. V. Ambroskina
Russian Federation
3A, Partizana Zheleznyaka St., Krasnoyarsk 660022
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
K. Z. Bakhtiyarova
Russian Federation
132, Dostoevskogo St., Ufa 450005
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
S. B. Blinova
Russian Federation
1, Tsiolkovskogo St., Volgograd 400001
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
Z. A. Goncharova
Russian Federation
119, Suvorova St., Rostov-on-Don 344022
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
N. Yu. Gorokhova
Russian Federation
4, Sergelyakhskoye Sh., Yakutsk 677010
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
I. V. Greshnova
Russian Federation
7, Tret'yego Internatsionala St., Ulyanovsk 432017
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
L. G. Zaslavsky
Russian Federation
45/2, Lunacharskogo Prosp, St. Petersburg 194291
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
E. V. Krivomlina
Russian Federation
167, 1 Maya St., Krasnodar 350086
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
E. A. Luneva
Russian Federation
88, Nikitina St., Barnaul 656043
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
N. A. Malkova
Russian Federation
130, Nemirovicha-Danchenko St., Novosibirsk 630087
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
D. M. Merkulova
Russian Federation
8, Trubetskaya St., Build. 2, Moscow 119991
152, Budayskaya St., Moscow 129128
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
E. V. Nikishova
Russian Federation
10, Pobedy Boulevard, Orel 302028
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
A. I. Nilov
Russian Federation
159, Tashkentskaya St., Samara 443095
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
E. S. Novikova
Russian Federation
61/2, Shchepkina St., Moscow 129110
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
A. O. Polyakov
Russian Federation
185, Volgogradskaya St., Yekaterinburg 620102
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
M. V. Popova
Russian Federation
151, Moskovskiy Prosp., Voronezh 394066
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
T. V. Romanova
Russian Federation
91 L’va Tolstogo St., Samara 443020
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
S. A. Sivertseva
Russian Federation
8/1, Yuriya Semovskih St., Tyumen 625000
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
N. N. Spirin
Russian Federation
Scientific and Educational Centre for Demyelinating Diseases based at Department of Neurology, Medical Genetics and Neurosurgery
5, Revolutsionnaya St., Yaroslavl 150000
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
S. B. Stepanova
Russian Federation
16, Vorovskogo St., Chelyabinsk 454092
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
T. N. Trushnikova
Russian Federation
85, Pushkina St., Perm 614990
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
T. I. Khaibullin
Russian Federation
30A, Adoratskogo St., Kazan 420137
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
G. E. Sheiko
Russian Federation
10/1, Minina and Pozharskogo Sq., Nizhny Novgorod 603005
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
M. A. Sherman
Russian Federation
42, Vorovskogo St., Kirov 610027
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
I. A. Yampolskaya-Gosteva
Russian Federation
23, Aksakova St., Orenburg 460024
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
A. Ya. Gayduk
Russian Federation
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery
89, Chapaevskaya St., Samara 443099
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
N. G, Polarnaya
Russian Federation
3 Stavropol’skaya Street, Samara 443090
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
A. N. Boyko
Russian Federation
Alexey Nikolaevich Boyko, Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics; Department of Neuroimmunology
1, Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997
1, Ostrovityanova St., Build. 10, Moscow 117997
Competing Interests:
There are no conflicts of interest
References
1. Merkulova DM, Merkulov YuA. Myasthenia gravis. In: Karlov V.A. (ed.). Neurology of the face. 2nd ed. Moscow: Russian University of Medicine; 2025. P. 334-46. (In Russ.)
2. Dewilde S, Philips G, Paci S, et al. Patient-reported burden of myasthenia gravis: baseline results of the international prospective, observational, longitudinal real-world digital study MyRealWorld-MG. BMJ Open. 2023;13(1):e066445. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066445
3. Merkulov YuA, Plieva EL, Merkulova DM. Pain syndrome, “drooping neck” and myasthenia gravis: clinical observation and literature review. Medical Alphabet. 2024;21:7-12. (In Russ.) doi: 10.33667/2078-5631-2024-21-7-12
4. Howard JF, Utsugisawa K, Benatar M, et al. Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in antiacetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (REGAIN): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(12):976-86. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30369-1
5. Vu T, Meisel A, Mantegazza R, et al. Terminal Complement Inhibitor Ravulizumab in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis. NEJM Evid. 2022;1(5):EVIDoa2100066. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2100066
6. Boiko AN, Bakhtiyarova KZ, Sherman MA, et al. Results of a study of the quality of life in patients with highly active multiple sclerosis in Russia. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2022;14(Suppl 1):9-15. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2022-1S-9-15
7. Estevez GDA, Fernandez P. Myasthenia gravis. Update on diagnosis and therapy. J Med Clin (Barc). 2023;161(3):119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2023.04.006
8. Ye Y, Murdock DJ, Chen C, et al. Epidemiology of myasthenia gravis in the United States. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1339167. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1339167
9. Carey IM, Banchoff E, Nirmalananthan N, et al. Prevalence and incidence of neuromuscular conditions in the UK between 2000 and 2019: A retrospective study using primary care data. PLoS One. 2021;16(12):e0261983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261983
10. Boscoe ANXH, L’Italien GJ, Harris LA, Cutter GR. Impact of refractory myasthenia gravis on health-related quality of life. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2019;20:173-81. doi: 10.1097/CND.0000000000000257
11. Farrugia ME, Goodfellow JA. A practical approach to managing patients with myasthenia gravis-opinions and a review of the literature. Front Neurol. 2020;11:604. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00604
12. Szczudlik P, Sobieszczuk E, Szyluk B, et al. Determinants of quality of life in myasthenia gravis patients. Front Neurol. 2020;11:553626. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.553626
13. Boldingh MI, Dekker L, Maniaol AH, et al. An up-date on health-related quality of life in myasthenia gravis – results from population based cohorts. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:115. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0298-1
14. Yang Y, Zhang M, Guo J, et al. Quality of life in 188 patients with myasthenia gravis in China. Int J Neurosci. 2016;126:455-62.
15. Garzon-Orjuela N, van der Werf L, Prieto-Pinto LC, et al. Quality of life in refractory generalized myasthenia gravis: a rapid review of the literature. Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2019;8:231-8. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2019.01121
16. Dumbuya JS, Ahmad B, Zeng C, et al. Assessing the effectiveness of measurement scales in evaluating the health-related quality of life in rare disease patients after treatment: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024;22(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02324-0
17. Muppidi S, Utsugisawa K, Benatar M, et al; Regain Study Group. Long-term safety and efficacy of eculizumab in generalized myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. 2019;60(1):14-24. doi: 10.1002/mus.26447
18. Antozzi C, Mantegazza R. Impact of Ravulizumab on Patient Outcomes and Quality of Life in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2023;14:305-12. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S408175
19. Vu T, Wiendl H, Katsuno M, et al. Ravulizumab in Myasthenia Gravis: A Review of the Current Evidence. J Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023;19:2639-55. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S374694
20. Ramdas S, Painho T, Vanegas MI, et al. Paediatr Targeted Treatments for Myasthenia Gravis in Children and Adolescents. Drugs. 2024;26(6):719-40. doi: 10.1007/s40272-024-00649-3
Review
For citations:
Vlasov YV, Merkulov YA, Alifirova VM, Ambroskina MV, Bakhtiyarova KZ, Blinova SB, Goncharova ZA, Gorokhova NY, Greshnova IV, Zaslavsky LG, Krivomlina EV, Luneva EA, Malkova NA, Merkulova DM, Nikishova EV, Nilov AI, Novikova ES, Polyakov AO, Popova MV, Romanova TV, Sivertseva SA, Spirin NN, Stepanova SB, Trushnikova TN, Khaibullin TI, Sheiko GE, Sherman MA, Yampolskaya-Gosteva IA, Gayduk AY, Polarnaya NG, Boyko AN. Results of medical and social research and assessment of quality of life in myasthenia gravis. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2025;17(5):11-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2025-5-11-20