From pathogenesis and research to the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in clinical practice: switching from anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy to siponimod (clinical case)
Abstract
The pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis is multifaceted and not fully investigated, but it is now clear that each patient has their own ratio of inflammation and neurodegeneration severity. Given the available evidence base, understanding of the pathogenesis underlying secondary progression, and accumulated clinical experience, it is important not only to make a timely diagnosis and prescribe adequate therapy, but also to monitor for continued progression in order to revise treatment with the aim of preventing patient disability. This publication describes a clinical case of a patient with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) who received therapy with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody infusion. The patient showed complete suppression of activity and no exacerbations, but despite this, there was a gradual progression on the EDSS scale from 4.5 to 6.0 points over 3 years of therapy. In this regard, the patient was transferred to therapy with siponimod, against which a decrease to 5.5 points was noted within a few months. At the time of publication, this indicator has remained stable for 3 years, indicating that the main goal of therapy for SPMS – preventing secondary progression – has been achieved.
Therefore, when treating patients with SPMS and ongoing secondary progression, even with complete suppression of activity and no exacerbations, including against the background of infusion therapy with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody drugs, it is necessary to consider switching to siponimod therapy.
About the Author
E. V. PopovaRussian Federation
10, Pistsovaya St., Moscow 127015
Competing Interests:
The article is sponsored by Novartis. The conflict of interests did not affect the results of the study.
References
1. Mikhailenko AA, Bisaga GN, Guseva NA, Skulyabin DI. Contribution of the Academy's neurologists to the study of multiple sclerosis (On the 140th anniversary of B.S. Doynikov's birth). Izvestiya Rossiyskoy Voyenno-meditsinskoy akademii = Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2019;38(3S):105-8. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/rmmar26148
2. Hollenbach JA, Oksenberg JR. The immunogenetics of multiple sclerosis: A comprehensive review. J Autoimmun. 2015 Nov;64:13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2015.06.010
3. Huynh JL, Casaccia P. Epigenetic mechanisms in multiple sclerosis: implications for pathogenesis and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2013 Feb;12(2):195-206. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70309-5
4. Eliseeva DD, Zakharova MN. Mechanisms of Neurodegeneration in Multiple Sclerosis. Zhurnal nevrologii i psihiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova = S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2022;122(7-2):5-13. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/jnevro20221220725
5. Kozin MS, Kulakova OG, Favorova OO. Participation of mitochondria in the development of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. Biochemistry. 2018;83(7):813-30. (In Russ.). doi: 10.1134/S0006297918070052
6. Elchaninova EYu, Afanasyeva AI, Smagina IV, Elchaninova SA. Relevance and prospects of practical use of laboratory biomarkers of the course of multiple sclerosis. Therapy. 2023;(5). (In Russ.). doi: 10.18565/therapy.2023.5.71-76
7. Thebault S, Abdoli M, Fereshtehnejad SM, et al. Serum neurofilament light chain predicts long term clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis. Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 25;10(1):10381. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67504-6
8. Sun M, Liu N, Xie Q, et al. A candidate biomarker of glial fibrillary acidic protein in CSF and blood in differentiating multiple sclerosis and its subtypes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 Jun;51:102870. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102870
9. Mosora O, Maier S, Manu D, et al. Exosomal microRNAs as Early Transition Biomarkers from Recurrent-Remissive to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Apr 20;26(8):3889. doi: 10.3390/ijms26083889
10. Koch M, Mostert J, Heersema D, et al. Plasma S100beta and NSE levels and progression in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2007 Jan 31;252(2):154-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2006.11.012
11. Moshnikova AN, Gorbacheva AV, Lapin SV, et al. Diagnostic value of intrathecal synthesis of immunoglobulins against measles, rubella, and varicella viruses in the differential diagnosis of demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system. Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology. 2020;14(2):15-22. (In Russ.). doi: 10.25692/ACEN.2020.2.2
12. Nazarov VD, Lapin SV, Surkova EA, et al. Diagnostic information value of intrathecal synthesis of free light chains of immunoglobulins in multiple sclerosis. Medical Immunology. 2015;17(3):235-44. (In Russ.). doi: 10.15789/1563-0625-2015-3-235-244
13. Matrosova MS, Bryukhov VV, Popova EV, et al. Quantitative assessment of magnetic susceptibility (QSM) in subcortical structures of the brain as a marker of neurodegeneration in relapsing-remitting and secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis. Meditsinskaya vizualizatsiya = Medical Visualization. 2023;27(2):12-22. (In Russ.). doi: 10.24835/1607-0763-1256
14. Brieva L, Calles C, Landete L, Oreja-Guevara C. Current challenges in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: diagnosis, activity detection and treatment. Front Immunol. 2025 Mar 21;16:1543649. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1543649
15. Cree BA, Arnold DL, Fox RJ, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of siponimod in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: Analysis of EXPAND core and extension data up to >5 years. Mult Scler. 2022 Sep;28(10):1591-605. doi: 10.1177/13524585221083194
16. Kappos L, Bar-Or A, Cree BAC, et al; EXPAND Clinical Investigators. Siponimod versus placebo in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (EXPAND): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2018 Mar 31;391(10127):1263-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30475-6
17. Gergely P, Nuesslein-Hildesheim B, Guerini D, et al. The selective sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator BAF312 redirects lymphocyte distribution and has species-specific effects on heart rate. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;167(5):1035-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02061.x
18. Gentile A, Musella A, Bullitta S, et al. Siponimod (BAF312) prevents synaptic neurodegeneration in experimental multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation. 2016;13(1). doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0686-4
19. Kappos L, Li DKB, Stüve O, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Siponimod (BAF312) in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(9):1089. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.1451
Review
For citations:
Popova EV. From pathogenesis and research to the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in clinical practice: switching from anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy to siponimod (clinical case). Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. (In Russ.)