Preview

Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics

Advanced search

Possibilities of using laboratory biomarkers for the objective diagnosis of depressive disorders

https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2021-2-34-39

Full Text:

Abstract

 Objective: to assess the possibility of using laboratory biomarkers to objectify psychopathological disorders in patients with depressive spectrum disorders (RSDs).

Patients and methods. The investigation enrolled 63 patients (mean age, 31.7±8.9 years) with new-onset RSDs of different etiologies. Group 1 included 21 patients with a mild to moderate depressive episode (DE); Group 2 consisted of 42 patients with neurotic depressive disorders (adjustment disorders). The severity of anxiety and depression was assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. In addition, the investigators studied laboratory  parameters: the levels of cortisol, homocysteine, prolactin,  vitamin B12, cortisol, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis  factor-α (TNF-α) in serum and platelet serotonin. They  also estimated changes in the most significant laboratory  parameters in 31 patients with depressive disorders: in 15 with  DE and in 16 with neurotic depression who had received 4-week monotherapy with agomelatine 25 mg/day.

Results and discussion. The differential diagnosis of  psychopathological disorders based on the clinical and  psychopathological method and psychometric assessment of  the patient's condition was shown to be difficult. It was  established that the objectification of these disorders using  known laboratory biomarkers (cortisol and platelet serotonin) did not give an unambiguous answer. At the same time, the  assessment of immunological parameters (the levels of  proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, TNF-α) can help to  solve this problem. The investigation also demonstrated that the use of non-monoaminergic antidepressants (MT1/MT2-type  melatonin receptor agonists) contributed to the reduced level of proinflammatory cytokines, which opens up  opportunities for finding new therapeutic approaches to  treating RSDs. 

Conclusion. Usage of biological markers may contribute not only to improvement in the accuracy of mental disorders  diagnosis but also to the development of new treatment approaches. Simultaneously, the selective use of individual biological markers (biochemical, metabolic, immunological, etc.)  is not very informative; therefore, their comprehensive  assessment is required.  

About the Authors

V. K. Shamrey
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Ministry of Defense of Russia
Russian Federation

 6, Academician Lebedev St., Saint Petersburg 194044, Russia 



E. S. Kurasov
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Ministry of Defense of Russia
Russian Federation

 6, Academician Lebedev St., Saint Petersburg 194044, Russia 



Ya. S. Zobin
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Ministry of Defense of Russia
Russian Federation

 6, Academician Lebedev St., Saint Petersburg 194044, Russia 



N. V. Tsygan
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Ministry of Defense of Russia
Russian Federation

 6, Academician Lebedev St., Saint Petersburg 194044, Russia 



References

1. Antropov YuA, Antropov AYu, Neznanov NG. Osnovy diagnostiki psikhicheskikh rasstroistv [Basics of mental disorders diagnostic]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2010. 384 p. (In Russ.).

2. Krasnov VN. Rasstroistva affektivnogo spectra [Disorders of the affective spectrum]. Moscow: Prakticheskaya meditsina; 2011. 432 p. (In Russ.).

3. Torres IJ, DeFreitas VG, DeFreitas CM, et al. Neurocognitive functioning in patients with bipolar I disorder recently recovered from a first manic episode. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;71(9):1234-42. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04997yel. Epub 2010 Mar 23.

4. ГGulyaeva NV. Brain plasticity and connectivitiy: mechanisms of comorbidity of neurological diseases and depression. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. C.S. Korsakova. 2016;116(11):157-62 (In Russ.).

5. Tiganov AS. New in the study of pathogenesis and therapy of endogenous depression. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2012;112(11):65-72 (In Russ.).

6. Hicks MH. Mental Health Screening and Coordination Of Care For Soldiers Deployed To Iraq And Afghanistan. Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;168(4):341-3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11010074

7. Maes M, Kubera M, Mihailova I, et al. Increased autoimmune responses against autoepitopes modified by oxidative and nitrosative damage in depression: implications for the pathways to chronic depression and neuroprogression. J Affect Disord. 2013 Jul;149(1-3):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.06.039. Epub 2012 Aug 13.

8. Muller N. Immunology of major depression. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2014;21(2-3):123-30. doi: 10.1159/000356540. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

9. Gurovich IYa, Uzbekov MG. Towards understanding of mental disorders biomarkers. Sotsial'naya i klinicheskaya psikhiatriya. 2015;25(3):80-3 (In Russ.).

10. Dubinina EE, Mazo GE, Shchedrina LV. The main biochemical aspects of the pathogenesis of depression. Psikhicheskoe zdorov'e. 2017;15(7):26-7 (In Russ.).

11. Cuthbert BN. The RDoC framework: facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):28-35. doi: 10.1002/wps.20087

12. Podoprigora MG, Tytar' AD. The method of pictopolygraph as a way of objectification of results of psychodiagnostic research. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. 2015;(5):212-6 (In Russ.).

13. Shamrei VK, Marchenko AA, Kurasov ES, Lobachev AV. Prospects for objective monitoring and prognosis of mental health of military personnel. Doktor.Ru. 2018;(1):27-33 (In Russ.).

14. Shamrei VK, Marchenko AA, Kurasov ES. Modern approaches to objectifying the diagnosis of mental disorders. Vestnik Rossiiskoi voenno-meditsinskoi akademii. 2018;(4):38-44 (In Russ.).

15. Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, et al. Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classificationframework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;167(7):748-51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379

16. Klyushnik TP, Siryachenko TM, Sarmanova ZV, et al. Immunological reactions in various forms of mental pathology. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2009;109(4):55-8 (In Russ.).

17. Krizhanovskii AS, Shchedrina LV, Dubinina EE, Mazo GE. The role of neuroendocrine indicators in the formation of therapeutic resistance in depressive disorder. Psikhicheskoe zdorov'e.

18. 2017;15(4):10-6 (In Russ.).

19. Gorobets LN, Matrosova MI. Secretion of prolactin and peripheral sex hormones in patients with the first episode of schizophrenia. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2010;110(5):17-22 (In Russ.).

20. Zozulya SA, Siryachenko TM, Kaleda VG, et al. Features of the state of the immune system in endogenous mental diseases with severe affective disorders. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2011;111(12):63-7 (In Russ.).

21. Uzbekov MG, Gurovich IYa, Ivanova SA. Potential biomarkers of mental illness in the aspect of a systematic approach. Sotsial'naya i klinicheskaya psikhiatriya. 2016;26(1):77-95 (In Russ.).

22. Madhusoodanan S, Parida S, Jimenez C. Hyperprolactinemia associated with psychotropics – a review. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2010 Jun-Jul;25(4):281-97. doi: 10.1002/hup.1116

23. Aston J, Rechsteiner E, Bull N, et al. Hyperprolactinemia in early psychosis – non only due to antipsychotics. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Oct 1;34(7):1342-4.

24. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.02.019. Epub 2010 Feb 24.

25. Audhya T, Adams JB, Johansen L. Correlation of serotonin levels in CSF, platelets, plasma, and urine. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Oct;1820(10):1496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.05.012.

26. Epub 2012 Jun 1.

27. Thome J, Ehlis AC, Fallgatter AJ, et al. Biomarkers for attention-defi cit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A consensus report of the WFSBP task force on biological markers and the World Federation of ADHD. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;13(5):379-400. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2012.690535

28. Kobeissy F, Alawieh A, Mondello S, Boustany RM. Biomarkers in psychiatry: how close are we? Front Psychiatry. 2013 Jan 7;3:114. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00114. eCollection 2012.

29. Monroe SM, Harkness KL. Life stress, the «kindling» hypothesis, and the recurrence of depression: consideration from a life stress perspective. Psychol Rev. 2005 Apr;112(2):417-45. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.417


For citation:


Shamrey V.K., Kurasov E.S., Zobin Y.S., Tsygan N.V. Possibilities of using laboratory biomarkers for the objective diagnosis of depressive disorders. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2021;13(2):34-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2021-2-34-39

Views: 125


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-2711 (Print)
ISSN 2310-1342 (Online)